#17 fix: handle pull_request_review_comment payload differences in Gitea (#19)

src/create-prompt/index.ts

@@ -120,7 +120,9 @@ export function buildDisallowedToolsString(
   // If user has explicitly allowed some hardcoded disallowed tools, remove them from disallowed list
   const allowedList = normalizeToolList(allowedTools);
   if (allowedList.length > 0) {
-    disallowedTools = disallowedTools.filter((tool) => !allowedList.includes(tool));
+    disallowedTools = disallowedTools.filter(
+      (tool) => !allowedList.includes(tool),
+    );
   }
 
   let allDisallowedTools = disallowedTools.join(",");
@@ -164,16 +166,20 @@ export function prepareContext(
   let commentBody: string | undefined;
 
   if (isIssueCommentEvent(context)) {
-    commentId = context.payload.comment.id.toString();
+    commentId = context.payload.comment?.id?.toString();
-    commentBody = context.payload.comment.body;
+    commentBody = context.payload.comment?.body;
-    triggerUsername = context.payload.comment.user.login;
+    triggerUsername = context.payload.comment?.user?.login;
   } else if (isPullRequestReviewEvent(context)) {
-    commentBody = context.payload.review.body ?? "";
+    commentBody =
-    triggerUsername = context.payload.review.user.login;
+      context.payload.review?.body ?? context.payload.review?.content ?? "";
+    triggerUsername =
+      context.payload.review?.user?.login ?? context.payload.sender?.login;
   } else if (isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context)) {
-    commentId = context.payload.comment.id.toString();
+    commentId = context.payload.comment?.id?.toString();
-    commentBody = context.payload.comment.body;
+    commentBody =
-    triggerUsername = context.payload.comment.user.login;
+      context.payload.comment?.body ?? context.payload.review?.content;
+    triggerUsername =
+      context.payload.comment?.user?.login ?? context.payload.sender?.login;
   } else if (isIssuesEvent(context)) {
     triggerUsername = context.payload.issue.user.login;
   }
@@ -595,18 +601,7 @@ ${sanitizeContent(context.directPrompt)}
 </direct_prompt>`
     : ""
 }
-${
+${`<comment_tool_info>
-  eventData.eventName === "pull_request_review_comment"
-    ? `<comment_tool_info>
-IMPORTANT: For this inline PR review comment, you have been provided with ONLY the mcp__gitea__update_pull_request_comment tool to update this specific review comment.
-
-Tool usage example for mcp__gitea__update_pull_request_comment:
-{
-  "body": "Your comment text here"
-}
-All four parameters (owner, repo, commentId, body) are required.
-</comment_tool_info>`
-    : `<comment_tool_info>
 IMPORTANT: For this event type, you have been provided with ONLY the mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment tool to update comments.
 
 Tool usage example for mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment:
@@ -617,8 +612,7 @@ Tool usage example for mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment:
   "body": "Your comment text here"
 }
 All four parameters (owner, repo, commentId, body) are required.
-</comment_tool_info>`
+</comment_tool_info>`}
-}
 
 Your task is to analyze the context, understand the request, and provide helpful responses and/or implement code changes as needed.
 
@@ -632,7 +626,7 @@ Follow these steps:
 1. Create a Todo List:
    - Use your Gitea comment to maintain a detailed task list based on the request.
    - Format todos as a checklist (- [ ] for incomplete, - [x] for complete).
-   - Update the comment using ${eventData.eventName === "pull_request_review_comment" ? "mcp__gitea__update_pull_request_comment" : "mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment"} with each task completion.
+   - Update the comment using mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment with each task completion.
 
 2. Gather Context:
    - Analyze the pre-fetched data provided above.
@@ -738,8 +732,8 @@ ${!eventData.isPR || !eventData.claudeBranch ? `6. Final Update:` : `5. Final Up
 
 Important Notes:
 - All communication must happen through Gitea PR comments.
-- Never create new comments. Only update the existing comment using ${eventData.eventName === "pull_request_review_comment" ? "mcp__gitea__update_pull_request_comment" : "mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment"} with comment_id: ${context.claudeCommentId}.
+- Never create new comments. Only update the existing comment using mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment with comment_id: ${context.claudeCommentId}.
-- This includes ALL responses: code reviews, answers to questions, progress updates, and final results.${eventData.isPR ? "\n- PR CRITICAL: After reading files and forming your response, you MUST post it by calling mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment. Do NOT just respond with a normal response, the user will not see it." : ""}
+- This includes ALL responses: code reviews, answers to questions, progress updates, and final results.${eventData.isPR ? `\n- PR CRITICAL: After reading files and forming your response, you MUST post it by calling mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment. Do NOT just respond with a normal response, the user will not see it.` : ""}
 - You communicate exclusively by editing your single comment - not through any other means.
 - Use this spinner HTML when work is in progress: <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/markwylde/claude-code-gitea-action/refs/heads/gitea/assets/spinner.gif" width="14px" height="14px" style="vertical-align: middle; margin-left: 4px;" />
 ${eventData.isPR && !eventData.claudeBranch ? `- Always push to the existing branch when triggered on a PR.` : eventData.claudeBranch ? `- IMPORTANT: You are already on the correct branch (${eventData.claudeBranch}). Do not create additional branches.` : `- IMPORTANT: You are currently on the base branch (${eventData.baseBranch}). First check for existing claude branches for this ${eventData.isPR ? "PR" : "issue"} and use them if found, otherwise create a new branch using mcp__local_git_ops__create_branch.`}
@@ -750,8 +744,8 @@ ${eventData.isPR && !eventData.claudeBranch ? `- Always push to the existing bra
   - mcp__local_git_ops__delete_files: {"files": ["path/to/old.js"], "message": "chore: remove deprecated file"}
 - Display the todo list as a checklist in the Gitea comment and mark things off as you go.
 - All communication must happen through Gitea PR comments.
-- Never create new comments. Only update the existing comment using ${eventData.eventName === "pull_request_review_comment" ? "mcp__gitea__update_pull_request_comment" : "mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment"}.
+- Never create new comments. Only update the existing comment using mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment.
-- This includes ALL responses: code reviews, answers to questions, progress updates, and final results.${eventData.isPR ? "\n- PR CRITICAL: After reading files and forming your response, you MUST post it by calling mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment. Do NOT just respond with a normal response, the user will not see it." : ""}
+- This includes ALL responses: code reviews, answers to questions, progress updates, and final results.${eventData.isPR ? `\n- PR CRITICAL: After reading files and forming your response, you MUST post it by calling mcp__gitea__update_issue_comment. Do NOT just respond with a normal response, the user will not see it.` : ""}
 - You communicate exclusively by editing your single comment - not through any other means.
 - Use this spinner HTML when work is in progress: <img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ac382c7-e004-429b-8e35-7feb3e8f9c6f" width="14px" height="14px" style="vertical-align: middle; margin-left: 4px;" />
 ${eventData.isPR && !eventData.claudeBranch ? `- Always push to the existing branch when triggered on a PR.` : `- IMPORTANT: You are already on the correct branch (${eventData.claudeBranch || "the created branch"}). Never create new branches when triggered on issues or closed/merged PRs.`}

src/entrypoints/update-comment-link.ts

@@ -41,15 +41,22 @@ async function run() {
       // GitHub has separate ID namespaces for review comments and issue comments
       // We need to use the correct API based on the event type
       if (isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context)) {
-        // For PR review comments, use the pulls API
+        // Try the PR review comment endpoint first; Gitea may have created an
-        console.log(`Fetching PR review comment ${commentId}`);
+        // issue comment instead (no comment.id in payload), so fall through on 404.
-        const response = await client.api.customRequest(
+        try {
-          "GET",
+          console.log(`Fetching PR review comment ${commentId}`);
-          `/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/pulls/comments/${commentId}`,
+          const response = await client.api.customRequest(
-        );
+            "GET",
-        comment = response.data;
+            `/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/pulls/comments/${commentId}`,
-        isPRReviewComment = true;
+          );
-        console.log("Successfully fetched as PR review comment");
+          comment = response.data;
+          isPRReviewComment = true;
+          console.log("Successfully fetched as PR review comment");
+        } catch {
+          console.log(
+            "PR review comment not found, falling back to issue comment",
+          );
+        }
       }
 
       // For all other event types, use the issues API

src/github/context.ts

@@ -10,6 +10,20 @@ import type {
 import type { ModeName } from "../modes/types";
 import { DEFAULT_MODE, isValidMode } from "../modes/registry";
 
+// Gitea review payloads use `review.content` instead of `review.body`, and
+// `sender` instead of nested user objects. These types extend the GitHub base
+// types to make both fields available without `as any` casts.
+export type GiteaPullRequestReviewEvent = PullRequestReviewEvent & {
+  review?: { content?: string };
+  sender?: { login: string };
+};
+
+export type GiteaPullRequestReviewCommentEvent =
+  PullRequestReviewCommentEvent & {
+    review?: { type: string; content: string };
+    sender?: { login: string };
+  };
+
 export type ParsedGitHubContext = {
   runId: string;
   eventName: string;
@@ -24,8 +38,8 @@ export type ParsedGitHubContext = {
     | IssuesEvent
     | IssueCommentEvent
     | PullRequestEvent
-    | PullRequestReviewEvent
+    | GiteaPullRequestReviewEvent
-    | PullRequestReviewCommentEvent;
+    | GiteaPullRequestReviewCommentEvent;
   entityNumber: number;
   isPR: boolean;
   inputs: {
@@ -181,13 +195,15 @@ export function isPullRequestEvent(
 
 export function isPullRequestReviewEvent(
   context: ParsedGitHubContext,
-): context is ParsedGitHubContext & { payload: PullRequestReviewEvent } {
+): context is ParsedGitHubContext & { payload: GiteaPullRequestReviewEvent } {
   return context.eventName === "pull_request_review";
 }
 
 export function isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(
   context: ParsedGitHubContext,
-): context is ParsedGitHubContext & { payload: PullRequestReviewCommentEvent } {
+): context is ParsedGitHubContext & {
+  payload: GiteaPullRequestReviewCommentEvent;
+} {
   return context.eventName === "pull_request_review_comment";
 }
 

src/github/operations/comment-logic.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-import { GITEA_SERVER_URL } from "../api/config";
-
 export type ExecutionDetails = {
   cost_usd?: number;
   duration_ms?: number;
@@ -166,7 +164,11 @@ export function updateCommentBody(input: CommentUpdateInput): string {
           .filter((segment) => segment);
         const [owner, repo] = segments;
         if (owner && repo) {
-          branchUrl = `${GITEA_SERVER_URL}/${owner}/${repo}/src/branch/${finalBranchName}`;
+          const serverUrl =
+            process.env.GITEA_SERVER_URL ||
+            process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL ||
+            "https://github.com";
+          branchUrl = `${serverUrl}/${owner}/${repo}/src/branch/${finalBranchName}`;
         }
       } catch (error) {
         console.warn(`Failed to derive branch URL from job URL: ${error}`);

src/github/operations/comments/create-initial.ts

@@ -31,7 +31,10 @@ export async function createInitialComment(
     console.log(`Repository: ${owner}/${repo}`);
 
     // Only use createReplyForReviewComment if it's a PR review comment AND we have a comment_id
-    if (isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context)) {
+    if (
+      isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context) &&
+      context.payload.comment?.id
+    ) {
       console.log(`Creating PR review comment reply`);
       response = await api.customRequest(
         "POST",

src/github/validation/trigger.ts

@@ -45,8 +45,9 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
   // Check for issue label trigger
   if (isIssuesEvent(context) && context.eventAction === "labeled") {
     const triggerLabel = context.inputs.labelTrigger?.trim();
-    const appliedLabel = (context.payload as IssuesLabeledEvent).label?.name
+    const appliedLabel = (
-      ?.trim();
+      context.payload as IssuesLabeledEvent
+    ).label?.name?.trim();
 
     console.log(
       `Checking label trigger: expected='${triggerLabel}', applied='${appliedLabel}'`,
@@ -55,7 +56,9 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
     if (
       triggerLabel &&
       appliedLabel &&
-      triggerLabel.localeCompare(appliedLabel, undefined, { sensitivity: "accent" }) === 0
+      triggerLabel.localeCompare(appliedLabel, undefined, {
+        sensitivity: "accent",
+      }) === 0
     ) {
       console.log(`Issue labeled with trigger label '${triggerLabel}'`);
       return true;
@@ -115,9 +118,10 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
 
     // Check if trigger user is in requested reviewers (treat same as mention in text)
     const triggerUser = triggerPhrase.replace(/^@/, "");
-    const requestedReviewers = context.payload.pull_request.requested_reviewers || [];
+    const requestedReviewers =
-    const isReviewerRequested = requestedReviewers.some(reviewer => 
+      context.payload.pull_request.requested_reviewers || [];
-      'login' in reviewer && reviewer.login === triggerUser
+    const isReviewerRequested = requestedReviewers.some(
+      (reviewer) => "login" in reviewer && reviewer.login === triggerUser,
     );
 
     if (isReviewerRequested) {
@@ -131,9 +135,12 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
   // Check for pull request review body trigger
   if (
     isPullRequestReviewEvent(context) &&
-    (context.eventAction === "submitted" || context.eventAction === "edited")
+    (context.eventAction === "submitted" ||
+      context.eventAction === "edited" ||
+      context.eventAction === "reviewed")
   ) {
-    const reviewBody = context.payload.review.body || "";
+    const reviewBody =
+      context.payload.review?.body ?? context.payload.review?.content ?? "";
     // Check for exact match with word boundaries or punctuation
     const regex = new RegExp(
       `(^|\\s)${escapeRegExp(triggerPhrase)}([\\s.,!?;:]|$)`,
@@ -153,7 +160,7 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
   ) {
     const commentBody = isIssueCommentEvent(context)
       ? context.payload.comment.body
-      : context.payload.comment.body;
+      : (context.payload.comment?.body ?? context.payload.review?.content);
     // Check for exact match with word boundaries or punctuation
     const regex = new RegExp(
       `(^|\\s)${escapeRegExp(triggerPhrase)}([\\s.,!?;:]|$)`,