Attempt to make this work

MIGRATION.md

@@ -5,16 +5,19 @@ This document outlines the changes made to migrate from GitHub App authenticatio
 ## What Changed
 
 ### 1. Removed GitHub App Dependencies
+
 - **Before**: Used OIDC token exchange with Anthropic's GitHub App service
 - **After**: Uses standard `GITHUB_TOKEN` from workflow environment
 - **Benefit**: No external dependencies, works with any Git provider
 
 ### 2. Self-Contained Implementation
+
 - **Before**: Depended on external `anthropics/claude-code-base-action`
 - **After**: Includes built-in Claude execution engine
 - **Benefit**: Complete control over functionality, no external action dependencies
 
 ### 3. Gitea Compatibility
+
 - **Before**: GitHub-specific triggers and authentication
 - **After**: Compatible with Gitea Actions (with some limitations)
 - **Benefit**: Works with self-hosted Gitea instances
@@ -22,6 +25,7 @@ This document outlines the changes made to migrate from GitHub App authenticatio
 ## Required Changes for Existing Users
 
 ### Workflow Permissions
+
 Update your workflow permissions:
 
 ```yaml
@@ -40,6 +44,7 @@ permissions:
 ```
 
 ### Required Token Input
+
 Now required to explicitly provide a GitHub token:
 
 ```yaml
@@ -58,6 +63,7 @@ Now required to explicitly provide a GitHub token:
 ## Gitea Setup
 
 ### 1. Basic Gitea Workflow
+
 Use the example in `examples/gitea-claude.yml`:
 
 ```yaml
@@ -86,13 +92,14 @@ jobs:
           fetch-depth: 0
 
       - name: Run Claude Assistant
-        uses: ./  # Adjust path as needed for your Gitea setup
+        uses: ./ # Adjust path as needed for your Gitea setup
         with:
           github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
           anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
 ```
 
 ### 2. Gitea Limitations
+
 Be aware of these Gitea Actions limitations:
 
 - **`issue_comment` on PRs**: May not trigger reliably in some Gitea versions
@@ -105,16 +112,19 @@ Be aware of these Gitea Actions limitations:
 ### 3. Gitea Workarounds
 
 #### For PR Comments
+
 Use `issue_comment` instead of `pull_request_review_comment`:
 
 ```yaml
 on:
   issue_comment:
-    types: [created]  # This covers both issue and PR comments
+    types: [created] # This covers both issue and PR comments
 ```
 
 #### For Code Review Comments
+
 Gitea has limited support for code review comment webhooks. Consider using:
+
 - Regular issue comments on PRs
 - Manual trigger via issue assignment
 - Custom webhooks (advanced setup)
@@ -122,21 +132,25 @@ Gitea has limited support for code review comment webhooks. Consider using:
 ## Benefits of Migration
 
 ### 1. Simplified Authentication
+
 - No OIDC token setup required
 - Uses standard workflow tokens
 - Works with custom GitHub tokens
 
 ### 2. Provider Independence
+
 - No dependency on Anthropic's GitHub App service
 - Works with any Git provider supporting Actions
 - Self-contained functionality
 
 ### 3. Enhanced Control
+
 - Direct control over Claude execution
 - Customizable tool management
 - Easier debugging and modifications
 
 ### 4. Gitea Support
+
 - Compatible with self-hosted Gitea
 - Automatic fallback to REST API (no GraphQL dependency)
 - Simplified permission checking for Gitea environments
@@ -148,8 +162,10 @@ Gitea has limited support for code review comment webhooks. Consider using:
 ### Common Issues
 
 #### 1. Token Permissions
+
 **Error**: "GitHub token authentication failed"
 **Solution**: Ensure workflow has required permissions:
+
 ```yaml
 permissions:
   contents: write
@@ -158,36 +174,45 @@ permissions:
 ```
 
 #### 2. Gitea Trigger Issues
+
 **Error**: Workflow not triggering on PR comments
 **Solution**: Use `issue_comment` instead of `pull_request_review_comment`
 
 #### 3. Missing Dependencies
+
 **Error**: "Module not found" or TypeScript errors
 **Solution**: Run `npm install` or `bun install` to update dependencies
 
 ### Gitea-Specific Issues
 
 #### 1. Authentication Errors
+
 **Error**: "Failed to check permissions: HttpError: Bad credentials"
 **Solution**: This is normal in Gitea environments. The action automatically detects Gitea and bypasses GitHub-specific permission checks.
 
 #### 1a. User Profile API Errors
+
 **Error**: "Prepare step failed with error: Visit Project" or "GET /users/{username} - 404"
 **Solution**: This occurs when Gitea's user profile API differs from GitHub's. The action automatically detects Gitea and skips user type validation.
 
 #### 2. Limited Event Support
+
 Some GitHub Events may not be fully supported in Gitea. Use basic triggers:
+
 - `issue_comment` for comments
 - `issues` for issue events
 - `push` for code changes
 
 #### 3. Token Scope Limitations
+
 Gitea tokens may have different scope limitations. Ensure your Gitea instance allows:
+
 - Repository write access
 - Issue/PR comment creation
 - Branch creation and updates
 
 #### 4. GraphQL Not Supported
+
 **Error**: GraphQL queries failing
 **Solution**: The action automatically detects Gitea and uses REST API instead of GraphQL. No manual configuration needed.
 
@@ -204,5 +229,6 @@ Gitea tokens may have different scope limitations. Ensure your Gitea instance al
 ## Example Workflows
 
 See the `examples/` directory for complete workflow examples:
+
 - `claude.yml` - Updated GitHub Actions workflow
 - `gitea-claude.yml` - Gitea-compatible workflow

action.yml

@@ -163,4 +163,3 @@ runs:
         echo '```json' >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
         cat "${{ steps.claude-code.outputs.execution_file }}" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
         echo '```' >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
-

examples/gitea-claude.yml

@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ jobs:
           fetch-depth: 0
 
       - name: Run Claude Assistant
-        uses: ./  # Use local action (adjust path as needed)
+        uses: ./ # Use local action (adjust path as needed)
         with:
-          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}  # Use standard workflow token
+          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Use standard workflow token
           anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
           timeout_minutes: "60"
           trigger_phrase: "@claude"

src/claude/executor.ts

@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ export class ClaudeExecutor {
 
   private initializeClient() {
     if (this.config.useBedrock || this.config.useVertex) {
-      throw new Error("Bedrock and Vertex AI not supported in simplified implementation");
+      throw new Error(
+        "Bedrock and Vertex AI not supported in simplified implementation",
+      );
     }
 
     if (!this.config.apiKey) {
@@ -63,11 +65,17 @@ export class ClaudeExecutor {
 
   private parseTools(): { allowed: string[]; disallowed: string[] } {
     const allowed = this.config.allowedTools
-      ? this.config.allowedTools.split(",").map(t => t.trim()).filter(Boolean)
+      ? this.config.allowedTools
+          .split(",")
+          .map((t) => t.trim())
+          .filter(Boolean)
       : [];
 
     const disallowed = this.config.disallowedTools
-      ? this.config.disallowedTools.split(",").map(t => t.trim()).filter(Boolean)
+      ? this.config.disallowedTools
+          .split(",")
+          .map((t) => t.trim())
+          .filter(Boolean)
       : [];
 
     return { allowed, disallowed };
@@ -92,7 +100,9 @@ export class ClaudeExecutor {
       const prompt = await this.readPrompt();
       const tools = this.parseTools();
 
-      console.log(`Executing Claude with model: ${this.config.model || "claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219"}`);
+      console.log(
+        `Executing Claude with model: ${this.config.model || "claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219"}`,
+      );
       console.log(`Allowed tools: ${tools.allowed.join(", ") || "none"}`);
       console.log(`Disallowed tools: ${tools.disallowed.join(", ") || "none"}`);
 
@@ -134,7 +144,9 @@ export class ClaudeExecutor {
   }
 }
 
-export async function runClaude(config: ClaudeExecutorConfig): Promise<ClaudeExecutorResult> {
+export async function runClaude(
+  config: ClaudeExecutorConfig,
+): Promise<ClaudeExecutorResult> {
   const executor = new ClaudeExecutor(config);
   return await executor.execute();
 }

src/entrypoints/execute-claude.ts

@@ -10,8 +10,12 @@ async function main() {
       model: process.env.ANTHROPIC_MODEL || process.env.MODEL,
       promptFile: process.env.PROMPT_FILE,
       prompt: process.env.PROMPT,
-      maxTurns: process.env.MAX_TURNS ? parseInt(process.env.MAX_TURNS) : undefined,
+      maxTurns: process.env.MAX_TURNS
-      timeoutMinutes: process.env.TIMEOUT_MINUTES ? parseInt(process.env.TIMEOUT_MINUTES) : 30,
+        ? parseInt(process.env.MAX_TURNS)
+        : undefined,
+      timeoutMinutes: process.env.TIMEOUT_MINUTES
+        ? parseInt(process.env.TIMEOUT_MINUTES)
+        : 30,
       mcpConfig: process.env.MCP_CONFIG,
       allowedTools: process.env.ALLOWED_TOOLS,
       disallowedTools: process.env.DISALLOWED_TOOLS,

src/entrypoints/update-comment-link.ts

@@ -133,7 +133,68 @@ async function run() {
           }
         } catch (error) {
           console.error("Error checking for changes in branch:", error);
-          // Don't fail the entire update if we can't check for changes
+
+          // For Gitea compatibility, try alternative approach
+          try {
+            console.log(
+              "Trying alternative branch comparison for Gitea compatibility...",
+            );
+
+            // Get the branch info to see if it exists and has commits
+            const branchResponse = await octokit.rest.repos.getBranch({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              branch: claudeBranch,
+            });
+
+            // Get base branch info for comparison
+            const baseResponse = await octokit.rest.repos.getBranch({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              branch: baseBranch,
+            });
+
+            const branchSha = branchResponse.data.commit.sha;
+            const baseSha = baseResponse.data.commit.sha;
+
+            // If SHAs are different, assume there are changes and add PR link
+            if (branchSha !== baseSha) {
+              console.log(
+                `Branch ${claudeBranch} appears to have changes (different SHA from base)`,
+              );
+              const entityType = context.isPR ? "PR" : "Issue";
+              const prTitle = encodeURIComponent(
+                `${entityType} #${context.entityNumber}: Changes from Claude`,
+              );
+              const prBody = encodeURIComponent(
+                `This PR addresses ${entityType.toLowerCase()} #${context.entityNumber}\n\nGenerated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)`,
+              );
+              const prUrl = `${serverUrl}/${owner}/${repo}/compare/${baseBranch}...${claudeBranch}?quick_pull=1&title=${prTitle}&body=${prBody}`;
+              prLink = `\n[Create a PR](${prUrl})`;
+            } else {
+              console.log(
+                `Branch ${claudeBranch} has same SHA as base, no PR link needed`,
+              );
+            }
+          } catch (fallbackError) {
+            console.error(
+              "Fallback branch comparison also failed:",
+              fallbackError,
+            );
+            // If all checks fail, still add PR link to be safe
+            console.log(
+              "Adding PR link as fallback since we can't determine branch status",
+            );
+            const entityType = context.isPR ? "PR" : "Issue";
+            const prTitle = encodeURIComponent(
+              `${entityType} #${context.entityNumber}: Changes from Claude`,
+            );
+            const prBody = encodeURIComponent(
+              `This PR addresses ${entityType.toLowerCase()} #${context.entityNumber}\n\nGenerated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)`,
+            );
+            const prUrl = `${serverUrl}/${owner}/${repo}/compare/${baseBranch}...${claudeBranch}?quick_pull=1&title=${prTitle}&body=${prBody}`;
+            prLink = `\n[Create a PR](${prUrl})`;
+          }
         }
       }
     }

src/github/data/fetcher.ts

@@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ export async function fetchGitHubData({
   }
 
   // Check if we're in a Gitea environment (no GraphQL support)
-  const isGitea = process.env.GITHUB_API_URL && !process.env.GITHUB_API_URL.includes('api.github.com');
+  const isGitea =
+    process.env.GITHUB_API_URL &&
+    !process.env.GITHUB_API_URL.includes("api.github.com");
 
   let contextData: GitHubPullRequest | GitHubIssue | null = null;
   let comments: GitHubComment[] = [];
@@ -56,7 +58,9 @@ export async function fetchGitHubData({
     if (isGitea) {
       // Use REST API for Gitea compatibility
       if (isPR) {
-        console.log(`Fetching PR #${prNumber} data using REST API (Gitea mode)`);
+        console.log(
+          `Fetching PR #${prNumber} data using REST API (Gitea mode)`,
+        );
         const prResponse = await octokits.rest.pulls.get({
           owner,
           repo,
@@ -87,7 +91,7 @@ export async function fetchGitHubData({
             repo,
             issue_number: parseInt(prNumber),
           });
-          comments = commentsResponse.data.map(comment => ({
+          comments = commentsResponse.data.map((comment) => ({
             id: comment.id.toString(),
             databaseId: comment.id.toString(),
             body: comment.body || "",
@@ -106,7 +110,7 @@ export async function fetchGitHubData({
             repo,
             pull_number: parseInt(prNumber),
           });
-          changedFiles = filesResponse.data.map(file => ({
+          changedFiles = filesResponse.data.map((file) => ({
             path: file.filename,
             additions: file.additions || 0,
             deletions: file.deletions || 0,
@@ -119,7 +123,9 @@ export async function fetchGitHubData({
 
         reviewData = { nodes: [] }; // Simplified for Gitea
       } else {
-        console.log(`Fetching issue #${prNumber} data using REST API (Gitea mode)`);
+        console.log(
+          `Fetching issue #${prNumber} data using REST API (Gitea mode)`,
+        );
         const issueResponse = await octokits.rest.issues.get({
           owner,
           repo,
@@ -142,7 +148,7 @@ export async function fetchGitHubData({
             repo,
             issue_number: parseInt(prNumber),
           });
-          comments = commentsResponse.data.map(comment => ({
+          comments = commentsResponse.data.map((comment) => ({
             id: comment.id.toString(),
             databaseId: comment.id.toString(),
             body: comment.body || "",

src/github/operations/branch-cleanup.ts

@@ -34,9 +34,49 @@ export async function checkAndDeleteEmptyBranch(
       }
     } catch (error) {
       console.error("Error checking for commits on Claude branch:", error);
-      // If we can't check, assume the branch has commits to be safe
+
-      const branchUrl = `${GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${owner}/${repo}/tree/${claudeBranch}`;
+      // For Gitea compatibility, try alternative approach using branches endpoint
-      branchLink = `\n[View branch](${branchUrl})`;
+      try {
+        console.log(
+          "Trying alternative branch comparison for Gitea compatibility...",
+        );
+
+        // Get the branch info to see if it exists and has commits
+        const branchResponse = await octokit.rest.repos.getBranch({
+          owner,
+          repo,
+          branch: claudeBranch,
+        });
+
+        // Get base branch info for comparison
+        const baseResponse = await octokit.rest.repos.getBranch({
+          owner,
+          repo,
+          branch: baseBranch,
+        });
+
+        const branchSha = branchResponse.data.commit.sha;
+        const baseSha = baseResponse.data.commit.sha;
+
+        // If SHAs are different, assume there are commits
+        if (branchSha !== baseSha) {
+          console.log(
+            `Branch ${claudeBranch} appears to have commits (different SHA from base)`,
+          );
+          const branchUrl = `${GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${owner}/${repo}/tree/${claudeBranch}`;
+          branchLink = `\n[View branch](${branchUrl})`;
+        } else {
+          console.log(
+            `Branch ${claudeBranch} has same SHA as base, marking for deletion`,
+          );
+          shouldDeleteBranch = true;
+        }
+      } catch (fallbackError) {
+        console.error("Fallback branch comparison also failed:", fallbackError);
+        // If all checks fail, assume the branch has commits to be safe
+        const branchUrl = `${GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${owner}/${repo}/tree/${claudeBranch}`;
+        branchLink = `\n[View branch](${branchUrl})`;
+      }
     }
   }
 
@@ -49,9 +89,18 @@ export async function checkAndDeleteEmptyBranch(
         ref: `heads/${claudeBranch}`,
       });
       console.log(`✅ Deleted empty branch: ${claudeBranch}`);
-    } catch (deleteError) {
+    } catch (deleteError: any) {
       console.error(`Failed to delete branch ${claudeBranch}:`, deleteError);
-      // Continue even if deletion fails
+      console.log(`Delete error status: ${deleteError.status}`);
+
+      // For Gitea, branch deletion might not be supported via API
+      if (deleteError.status === 405 || deleteError.status === 404) {
+        console.log(
+          "Branch deletion not supported or branch doesn't exist remotely - this is expected for Gitea",
+        );
+      }
+
+      // Continue even if deletion fails - this is not critical
     }
   }
 

src/github/operations/branch.ts

@@ -107,14 +107,16 @@ export async function setupBranch(
       currentSHA = sourceBranchRef.data.object.sha;
     } catch (gitRefError: any) {
       // If git/refs fails (like in Gitea), use the branches endpoint
-      console.log(`git/refs failed, trying branches endpoint: ${gitRefError.message}`);
+      console.log(
+        `git/refs failed, trying branches endpoint: ${gitRefError.message}`,
+      );
       const branchResponse = await octokits.rest.repos.getBranch({
         owner,
         repo,
         branch: sourceBranch,
       });
-      // Gitea uses commit.id instead of commit.sha
+      // GitHub and Gitea both use commit.sha
-      currentSHA = branchResponse.data.commit.sha || branchResponse.data.commit.id;
+      currentSHA = branchResponse.data.commit.sha;
     }
 
     console.log(`Current SHA: ${currentSHA}`);
@@ -131,14 +133,18 @@ export async function setupBranch(
       console.log(`Successfully created branch via API: ${newBranch}`);
     } catch (createRefError: any) {
       // If git/refs creation fails (like in Gitea), that's expected
-      // We'll create the branch when we push files later
+      // Log the error details but continue - the branch will be created when we push files
-      console.log(`git createRef failed (expected for Gitea): ${createRefError.message}`);
+      console.log(
+        `git createRef failed (expected for Gitea): ${createRefError.message}`,
+      );
+      console.log(`Error status: ${createRefError.status}`);
       console.log(`Branch ${newBranch} will be created when files are pushed`);
+
+      // For Gitea, we can still proceed since the MCP server will create the branch on first push
+      // This is actually the preferred method for Gitea
     }
 
-    console.log(
+    console.log(`Branch setup completed for: ${newBranch}`);
-      `Branch setup completed for: ${newBranch}`,
-    );
 
     // Set outputs for GitHub Actions
     core.setOutput("CLAUDE_BRANCH", newBranch);

src/github/token.ts

@@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
 
 import * as core from "@actions/core";
 
-
-
-
 export async function setupGitHubToken(): Promise<string> {
   try {
     // Check if GitHub token was provided as override
@@ -25,7 +22,9 @@ export async function setupGitHubToken(): Promise<string> {
       return workflowToken;
     }
 
-    throw new Error("No GitHub token available. Please provide a github_token input or ensure GITHUB_TOKEN is available in the workflow environment.");
+    throw new Error(
+      "No GitHub token available. Please provide a github_token input or ensure GITHUB_TOKEN is available in the workflow environment.",
+    );
   } catch (error) {
     core.setFailed(
       `Failed to setup GitHub token: ${error}.\n\nPlease provide a \`github_token\` in the \`with\` section of the action in your workflow yml file, or ensure the workflow has access to the default GITHUB_TOKEN.`,

src/github/utils/image-downloader.ts

@@ -84,67 +84,135 @@ export async function downloadCommentImages(
       let bodyHtml: string | undefined;
 
       // Get the HTML version based on comment type
+      // Try with full+json mediaType first (GitHub), fallback to regular API (Gitea)
       switch (comment.type) {
         case "issue_comment": {
-          const response = await octokits.rest.issues.getComment({
+          try {
-            owner,
+            const response = await octokits.rest.issues.getComment({
-            repo,
+              owner,
-            comment_id: parseInt(comment.id),
+              repo,
-            mediaType: {
+              comment_id: parseInt(comment.id),
-              format: "full+json",
+              mediaType: {
-            },
+                format: "full+json",
-          });
+              },
-          bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+            });
+            bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+          } catch (error: any) {
+            console.log(
+              "Full+json format not supported, trying regular API for issue comment",
+            );
+            // Fallback for Gitea - use regular API without mediaType
+            const response = await octokits.rest.issues.getComment({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              comment_id: parseInt(comment.id),
+            });
+            // Gitea might not have body_html, use body instead
+            bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html || response.data.body;
+          }
           break;
         }
         case "review_comment": {
-          const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.getReviewComment({
+          try {
-            owner,
+            const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.getReviewComment({
-            repo,
+              owner,
-            comment_id: parseInt(comment.id),
+              repo,
-            mediaType: {
+              comment_id: parseInt(comment.id),
-              format: "full+json",
+              mediaType: {
-            },
+                format: "full+json",
-          });
+              },
-          bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+            });
+            bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+          } catch (error: any) {
+            console.log(
+              "Full+json format not supported, trying regular API for review comment",
+            );
+            // Fallback for Gitea
+            const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.getReviewComment({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              comment_id: parseInt(comment.id),
+            });
+            bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html || response.data.body;
+          }
           break;
         }
         case "review_body": {
-          const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.getReview({
+          try {
-            owner,
+            const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.getReview({
-            repo,
+              owner,
-            pull_number: parseInt(comment.pullNumber),
+              repo,
-            review_id: parseInt(comment.id),
+              pull_number: parseInt(comment.pullNumber),
-            mediaType: {
+              review_id: parseInt(comment.id),
-              format: "full+json",
+              mediaType: {
-            },
+                format: "full+json",
-          });
+              },
-          bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+            });
+            bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+          } catch (error: any) {
+            console.log(
+              "Full+json format not supported, trying regular API for review",
+            );
+            // Fallback for Gitea
+            const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.getReview({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              pull_number: parseInt(comment.pullNumber),
+              review_id: parseInt(comment.id),
+            });
+            bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html || response.data.body;
+          }
           break;
         }
         case "issue_body": {
-          const response = await octokits.rest.issues.get({
+          try {
-            owner,
+            const response = await octokits.rest.issues.get({
-            repo,
+              owner,
-            issue_number: parseInt(comment.issueNumber),
+              repo,
-            mediaType: {
+              issue_number: parseInt(comment.issueNumber),
-              format: "full+json",
+              mediaType: {
-            },
+                format: "full+json",
-          });
+              },
-          bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+            });
+            bodyHtml = response.data.body_html;
+          } catch (error: any) {
+            console.log(
+              "Full+json format not supported, trying regular API for issue",
+            );
+            // Fallback for Gitea
+            const response = await octokits.rest.issues.get({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              issue_number: parseInt(comment.issueNumber),
+            });
+            bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html || response.data.body;
+          }
           break;
         }
         case "pr_body": {
-          const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.get({
+          try {
-            owner,
+            const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.get({
-            repo,
+              owner,
-            pull_number: parseInt(comment.pullNumber),
+              repo,
-            mediaType: {
+              pull_number: parseInt(comment.pullNumber),
-              format: "full+json",
+              mediaType: {
-            },
+                format: "full+json",
-          });
+              },
-          // Type here seems to be wrong
+            });
-          bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html;
+            // Type here seems to be wrong
+            bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html;
+          } catch (error: any) {
+            console.log(
+              "Full+json format not supported, trying regular API for PR",
+            );
+            // Fallback for Gitea
+            const response = await octokits.rest.pulls.get({
+              owner,
+              repo,
+              pull_number: parseInt(comment.pullNumber),
+            });
+            bodyHtml = (response.data as any).body_html || response.data.body;
+          }
           break;
         }
       }

src/github/validation/actor.ts

@@ -13,10 +13,14 @@ export async function checkHumanActor(
   githubContext: ParsedGitHubContext,
 ) {
   // Check if we're in a Gitea environment
-  const isGitea = process.env.GITHUB_API_URL && !process.env.GITHUB_API_URL.includes('api.github.com');
+  const isGitea =
+    process.env.GITHUB_API_URL &&
+    !process.env.GITHUB_API_URL.includes("api.github.com");
 
   if (isGitea) {
-    console.log(`Detected Gitea environment, skipping actor type validation for: ${githubContext.actor}`);
+    console.log(
+      `Detected Gitea environment, skipping actor type validation for: ${githubContext.actor}`,
+    );
     return;
   }
 
@@ -38,9 +42,14 @@ export async function checkHumanActor(
 
     console.log(`Verified human actor: ${githubContext.actor}`);
   } catch (error) {
-    console.warn(`Failed to check actor type for ${githubContext.actor}:`, error);
+    console.warn(
+      `Failed to check actor type for ${githubContext.actor}:`,
+      error,
+    );
 
     // For compatibility, assume human actor if API call fails
-    console.log(`Assuming human actor due to API failure: ${githubContext.actor}`);
+    console.log(
+      `Assuming human actor due to API failure: ${githubContext.actor}`,
+    );
   }
 }

src/github/validation/permissions.ts

@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ export async function checkWritePermissions(
   const { repository, actor } = context;
 
   // For Gitea compatibility, check if we're in a non-GitHub environment
-  const isGitea = process.env.GITHUB_API_URL && !process.env.GITHUB_API_URL.includes('api.github.com');
+  const isGitea =
+    process.env.GITHUB_API_URL &&
+    !process.env.GITHUB_API_URL.includes("api.github.com");
 
   if (isGitea) {
     core.info(`Detected Gitea environment, assuming actor has permissions`);

src/github/validation/trigger.ts

@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
     inputs: { assigneeTrigger, triggerPhrase, directPrompt },
   } = context;
 
-  console.log(`Checking trigger: event=${context.eventName}, action=${context.eventAction}, phrase='${triggerPhrase}', assignee='${assigneeTrigger}', direct='${directPrompt}'`);
+  console.log(
+    `Checking trigger: event=${context.eventName}, action=${context.eventAction}, phrase='${triggerPhrase}', assignee='${assigneeTrigger}', direct='${directPrompt}'`,
+  );
 
   // If direct prompt is provided, always trigger
   if (directPrompt) {
@@ -29,7 +31,9 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
     let triggerUser = assigneeTrigger?.replace(/^@/, "") || "";
     const assigneeUsername = context.payload.issue.assignee?.login || "";
 
-    console.log(`Checking assignee trigger: user='${triggerUser}', assignee='${assigneeUsername}'`);
+    console.log(
+      `Checking assignee trigger: user='${triggerUser}', assignee='${assigneeUsername}'`,
+    );
 
     if (triggerUser && assigneeUsername === triggerUser) {
       console.log(`Issue assigned to trigger user '${triggerUser}'`);